| Matthew
Arnold
Painting of Matthew
Arnold by George Frederick Watts (1817-1904),
painted in 1880
|
|
|
Matthew Arnold (1822-1888)
was an English poet, critic and educationist who proposed
a division between “high culture” and “popular
culture” as a tool for thwarting the growth of democracy.
Until 1867, the right
to vote was restricted to land-holders but the Second Reform
Bill, passed that year, extended the franchise to practically
the entire urban male population. Arnold perceived it as
“anarchy” and a threat to “culture”.
Hence, in a series lectures starting that year and eventually
published as Culture and Anarchy, Arnold suggested practical
measures to check the development of democracy. Chief among
them was the proposition that the culture of the educated
elite should be different from the culture of the masses
– something that would have been inconceivable to
the greatest poets and artists in history, including Rumi,
Shakespeare and Goethe.
Iqbal was apparently
making an acute observation about such emerging trends when
he wrote in his private notebook, Stray Reflections, in
1910:
The imperial ambitions
of the various nations of Europe indicate that the Westerners
are tired of Democracy. The reaction against Democracy
in England and France is a very significant phenomenon.
But in order to grasp the meaning of this phenomenon the
student of political sciences should not content himself
merely with the investigation and discovery of the purely
historical causes which have brought it about; he must
go deeper and search the psychological causes of this
reaction.
In another entry in
the same notebook, the difference between the egalitarian
worldview of Iqbal and the elitist propositions of Arnold
are highlighted more explicitly:
Matthew Arnold defines
poetry as criticism of life. That life is criticism of
poetry is equally true.
Iqbal’s comment
about the poetry of Arnold, originally entered in the same
notebook in 1910, appeared in its revised form seven years
later in the journal New Era (Lucknow):
Matthew Arnold is
a very precise poet. I like, however, an element of vagueness
in poetry; since the vague appears profound to the emotions.
|